Tuesday, July 14, 2009

What is "THE Truth? part 2

This semester, I once again realized the difficulty of integrating my Christian perspective and secular worldview. Especially shocking was that there were various perspectives on and interpretations of “truth.” Different “truth” translates into different foundation and starting point. There was stark contrast in foundation and essence between Christian perspective, which states that truth must be affirmed and discovered, and secular worldview, which states that truth cannot be affirmed therefore created. Of course, mathematic formulas and scientific theories may be able to create “truth” and prove its validity. Such truth, however, ultimately fails to appeal to all people and is subject to change. For this reason, I cannot call this “truth” a “truth” but an “agreement.” My idea of truth is immutable, the absolute standard of all things, and preexisting. It is “the truth.”

In conclusion, the integration of Christian perspective and secular worldview is impossible without inserting “faith” (acceptance against uncertainty) into it because Christianity and the secular world have entirely different perspective in essence and starting points. My concern with regards to this aspect is whether to use qualitative methodology exclusively to integrate Christian perspective and a secular worldview. The premises of qualitative methodology, which affirm mutability and relativity of truth, will beg more questions and eventually come to the conclusion that truth is in the “making.” Perhaps my goal as a doctoral student is to delve into this matter further and devise appropriate research.

Monday, July 13, 2009

What is "THE" Truth?

July 11, 09

Faith reflection:

Q1: How can Christian educators teach from the biblical perspective?

Q2: How can they differentiate educational truths from secular truths and teach them accordingly from the biblical perspective?

A few weeks ago, I had a chance to read Parker Palmer’s book (1998), The courage to reach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. In the light of my Christian educator background I accept most of what Palmer lays out in his book. However, his definition of truth is quite questionable. Palmer (1998) maintains that “…The less we talk about truth, the more likely that our knowing, teaching, and learning will be dominated by a traditional- and mythical-model of truth, the objectivist model so deeply embedded in our collective unconscious that to ignore it is to give it power” (p. 102). From the Christian perspective, what Palmer describes as truth by the special religious groups is mythical objectivism. He argues that such views act as a hindrance to embracing diversity, ambiguity, creativity, conflicts, honesty, and humility (pp. 97-111). In that light, Palmer believed that a subject in education has the potential to carry the truth (pp. 105-107). From the postmodernist perspective, what Palmer suggests and emphasizes in regards to the definition of truth can be understood by many educators and be applicable in their teaching and education related endeavors. Yet from a different light what Palmer suggested could be different from what the Christian view implies. Thus, my primary research interest lies in taking the views of many educators such as Palmer on educational truths and looking at them from the Christian perspective. How can what they claim to be true be made applicable to what Christian educators try to do in faith-based education? For me, the biggest challenge lies there.

 

Golden-Biddle and Locke (2007)- Ch. 1

Golden-Biddle and Locke (2007) discussed in this book research composition worthy of publication. The authors in chapter 1 mentioned “the style and practice of our academic writing.” Emphasizing the role of researchers as “writers, ” the authors pointed out the significance of reflecting upon the following questions “what do we write?” “For whom do we write?” “Under what terms will our writing be granted a disciplinary audience?” in academic writings.

Also, the authors emphasize that our research articles provide coherent stories that point to particular theoretical contribution. The knowledge in the article should be seen as true and significant by small and big groups of reviewers representing communities. And the authors finally maintain that the writing task involves four components: 1. Acidulating theoretically relevant insights gained from research and study 2. Identifying and shaping a contribution site 3. Authoritatively arguing the uniqueness and value of the literature’s limitations, 4. Characterizing academic storytellers.

Cresswell Ch. 11

Creswell (2007) shows in chapter 11 the model of analysis and the application methods in qualitative research methodologies using a narrative study, a phenomenology, a grounded theory, and an ethnography from the gunman case study.

What was most fascinating about the case study was the application of “phenomenology.” The author stressed the concept of psychological phenomenology in analysis. In the study entitled “The meaning of fear for students caught in a near tragedy on campus,” Creswell provided a brilliant example of phenomenology research using the following questions: “What fear did the students experiences, and how did they experience it?” “What meanings did they ascribe to this experience?” 10 students were interviewed to obtain responses to these questions. Then the procedures of phenomenology research, based on the analysis model of Moustakas (1994), on the contents of the interviews were demonstrated

Since January of 2009, I have undertaken extensive theoretical studies and interviews on phenomenology research and their analyses for qualitative research project. Through this experience, I as a researcher learned that phenomenology research sheds light on people’s various understandings, interpretations, and experiences of a single incident. It can be said that the perspective of the individual experiencing phenomena is the key to determining his or her understanding and interpretation. For that reason, I believe psychological phenomenology is an important analysis method of phenomenology research.

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Creswell Ch. 10 (Standards of Validation and Evaluation)

In Chapter 10, Creswell (2007) mainly discussed validation, reliability, and standards of quality in qualitative research. He described various perspectives, the terms used by researchers, and many perspectives on validation.

According to Creswell (2007), he considered “validation” in qualitative research to assess the “accuracy” of the findings, as best described by the researcher and the participants. This view also suggests that any report of research is a representation by the author” (pp. 206-207). It is important to remember that Creswell maintained “validation as a distinct strength of qualitative research in that the account made through extensive time spent in the field, the detailed thick description, and the closeness of the researcher to the participants in the study all add to the value or accuracy of the study” (p. 207). Creswell noted several validation strategies, which are useful for researchers for the accuracy of their research (p. 207).

Also, Creswell dealt with “reliability” which often “refers to the stability of responses to multiple coders of date sets” (p. 210). According to him, reliability is often used in qualitative health science research. Lastly, Creswell described standards of quality that these criteria are cased on various perspectives, such as procedural, postmodern, and interpretive (pp. 210-213).

Generally, I appreciate Creswell’s research that I could know what qualitative research is more. Still, it seems like I am in process to build up the qualitative research skills and knowledge. Of course, I consider myself as a qualitative research novice in this field. One of the important things I have found is that I am very interested in “Case Study”, “Ground Theory”, and “Phenomenology” qualitative research methodologies that I might use for my dissertation. I hope this lesson will equip and make me as a professional qualitative researcher who is able to understand “validation”, “reliability”, and “standards of quality” in qualitative research.

 

My Freshman (Ch. 7 & Afterword)

Chapter 7: Lessons from my year as a freshman & Afterword

In chapter 7, Small (1997) mentioned the lessons she had learned as a freshman. Also included were needs and suggested improvements from the perspectives of students, teachers, and school. In afterword, she assured the readers of the ethical validity of her research citing the ethical standards of ethnographic methodology. For example, she stated that all interviewees had been explained the purpose of the interviews and that permission had been obtained from them.

I still do not understand the author’s reason for inserting chapter 7 and afterword. This may have to do with possible issues arising from the use of ethics in research. In other words, she had foreknowledge of ethical invalidity concerning her conducting ethnography research as an “undercover” agent. For this reason, I believe that chapter 7 and afterword are the pleas of the author. It is unacceptable that Small attempts to influence the readers in the closing of the book by defending her misuse of research ethics.

The author’s compassion for students as evident in her effort to understand their needs is noteworthy (p. 135). Also, her wholehearted expectation for the educational growth of students through learning from proper class attendance serves personally as a helpful reminder (p.145).

Regardless of other valid aspects of the research, it is clear that Small’s duplicity caused emotional scars to the freshmen students, whose transparent honesty she took advantage of (p. 161). In addition, it left a flaw in research ethics.

 

 

Faith Reflection: The True Light

April 12, 09

Faith Reflection:

“The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world” (John 1:9, NIV).

Faith Reflection:

As I celebrated Easter, I reflected upon the purpose of Christ’s incarnation, His words and deeds. Of all the Biblical titles given Jesus Christ such as Savior, Shepherd, Bridegroom etc., I favor “light.” Those whom Jesus met saw the light of hope. The Bible illustrates the following: those whom Jesus met saw the light of hope; where there had been power of darkness was illuminated with the ray of Christ and was filled with hope; despondency changed into hope. I believe that the word of God works the same even to this day.

As I am pursuing the doctoral program in Higher Education, I find myself living with a constant reminder to develop “Critical Views.” As much as it is a perspective absolutely necessary in academics, I sometimes come away with the frightening feeling that it enables me to see negativity rather than positivity, despondency rather than hope, and weaknesses rather than strengths.

A little while ago, North Korea launched missiles and announced the appointment of the successor to Kim, Jong Il is under way. In spite of the international outcry over the recent events, the subjects of the North Korea are thanking and praising Kim. It is said that US $1 a day can save many people in Africa from famine. Ironically, the undergraduate tuition at my school costs 40,000 times as much. For whom is this education?

The purpose of my study is to use my doctoral degree as a mere tool to effectively transmit the gospel of Christ. I reaffirm my ultimate objective of becoming the “light” of the world, as Christ has shown, by making proper use of knowledge, experience, human relations, and training I will have gained through my study.

 

March 28- April 4; Teaching and Learning (Important Information)

March 28- April 4:

From March 28 to April 4, I had mostly worked on “Teaching and Learning” class (Dr. Schreiner) based on teaching theoretical methodologies. Mostly I read Fink (2003) for this project. The following contents and quotations are very related with “Creating Curriculums” project:

 

THE MEANINGS OF SIGNIFICANT LEARNING EXPERIENCES FOR STUDENTS:

In a powerful learning experience, students will be engaged in their own learning, there will be a high energy level associated with it, and the “Whole process will have important outcomes or results. Not only will students be learning throughout the course, by the end of the course they will clearly have changed in some important way-they will have learned something important. And that learning will have the potential for changing their lives in an important way. It has been my observation that all significant learning offers one or more of the following values:

 

·      Enhancing our individual life: developing an ability to enjoy good art and music, developing a thoughtful philosophy of life, and so on.

·      Enabling us to contribute to the many communities if which we will be a part: family, local community, nation state, religion, special interest groups, the world.

·      Preparing us for the world of work: developing the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for being effective in one or more professional fields (p. 7).

 

Components of significant education in quality (p. 8):

Similarly, in higher education, colleges need to assemble good curricula, good instruction, and good faculty who can interact well with students.

 

New Forms of Teaching (pp. 20-22)

1.     Role-Playing, Simulation, Debate, and Case Studies

2.     Writing to Learn

3.     Small Group Learning

4.     The Assessment as Learning

5.     Problem-Based Learning

6.     Service Learning

7.     Online Learning

If learning is regarded not as the acquisition of information, but as a search for meaning and coherence in one’s life and, if an emphasis is placed on what is learned and its personal significance to the learner, rather than how much is learned, researchers would gain valuable new insights into both the mechanisms of learning and the relative advantages of teacher-controlled and learner-controlled modes of learning.

-PHILIP CANDY (1991) – p. 27

 

Fink’s Five Principles of Fine Teaching (p. 28)

Good courses are courses that. . .

·      Challenge students to significant kinds of learning.

·      Use active forms of learning.

·      Have teachers who care—about the subject, their students, and about teaching and learning.

·      Have teachers who interact well with students.

·      Have a good system of feedback, assessment, and grading.

 

The cognitive taxonomy (Bloom, 1956):- p. 29

The cognitive taxonomy consists of six kinds of learning arranged in a hierarchical sequence. These are, from the highest to the lowest:

1.    Evaluation

- A higher level question that does not have a single correct answer. It requires the student to judge the merit of an idea, a solution to a problem, or an aesthetic work. The student may also be asked to offer an opinion on an issue. (Q: Do you think schools are too easy? Is busing an appropriate remedy for desegregating schools? Do you think it is true that "Americans never had it so good?" Which U.S. senator is the most effective? To answer evaluation questions objective criteria or personal values must be applied. Some standard must be used. differing standards are quite acceptable and they naturally result in different answers. This type of question frequently is used to surface values or to cause students to realize that not everyone sees things the same way. It can be used to start a class discussion. It can also precede a follow-up analysis or synthesis question like, "Why?"

2.    Synthesis (종합)

                                    - Higher order question that asks the student to perform original and creative thinking. Synthesis questions ask students to:

                  Produce original communications. (Q: What's a good name for this invention? Write a letter to the editor on a social issue of concern to you. Make a collage of pictures and words that represents your beliefs and feelings about the issue.)

                   

                  Make predictions. (Q: How would the U.S.A. be different if the South had won the Civil War? What would happen if school attendance was made optional? What is the next likely development in popular music?)

                   

                  Solve problems--although analysis questions may also ask students to solve problems, synthesis questions differ because they don't require a single correct answer but, instead allow a variety of creative answers. (How could we determine the number of pennies in a jar without counting them? How can we raise money for our ecology project? Words typically used in synthesis questions: predict, produce, write, design, develop, synthesize, construct, how can we improve, what would happen if, can you devise, how can we solve.

 

3.    Analysis

                                    -  Higher order questions that require students to think critically and in depth. [Unless students can be brought to the higher levels of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, it is unlikely that transfer will take place, i.e., this is stuff I can use rather than this is just more dumb school stuff that I can forget after I take the test. If teachers don't ask higher-level questions, it is unlikely that most students will transfer school work to real life. They may not even be able to apply it to school situations other than the one in which it was "learned." E.g., we "know" that students know more than scores on the CAP Test or SAT would suggest.] In analysis questions, students are asked to engage in three kinds of cognitive processes:

 

                  Identify the motives, reasons, and/or causes for a specific occurrence (Q: Why was Israel selected as the site for the Jewish nation?), consider and analyze available information to reach a conclusion, inference, or generalization based on this information (Q: After studying the French, American, and Russian revolutions, what can you conclude about the causes of a revolution?), or 


Words typically used: identify motives/causes, draw conclusions, determine evidence, support, analyze, why.

 

4.    Application

-     A question that asks a student to apply previously learned information to reach an answer. Solving math word problems is an example. Q: According to our definition of socialism, which of the following nations would be considered to be socialist? 
Words typically used: apply, classify, use, choose, employ, write and example, solve, how many, which, what is. 


 

5.    Comprehension (이해, 파악)

-     Demonstrate that the student has sufficient understanding to organize and arrange material mentally. Q: What do you think Hamlet meant when he said, "to be or not to be, that is the question?" (Rosenshine, among others, would argue that one of the best ways to teach is to teach pupils how to ask their own questions about the topic under consideration.) 
Words typically used: describe, compare, contrast, rephrase, put in your own words, and explain the main idea. 


 

6.    Knowledge (meaning the ability to recall information)

-       Recognize or recall information. Q: What is the capital of Maine? Who wrote "Hamlet?" 
Words typically used: define, recall, recognize, remember, who, what, where, when. 


 

Major Categories in the Taxonomy of Significant Learning- By Fink (p.p. 31-32)

1.     Foundational Knowledge.

-       At the base of most other kinds of learning is the need for students to “know” something.  Knowing, as used here, refers to students’ ability to understand and remember specific information and ideas.  It is important for people today to have some valid basic knowledge, for example, about science, history, literature, geography, etc.  They also need to understand major ideas or perspectives, for example, what evolution is (and what it is not), what capitalism is (and is not), and so forth.  Special Value:  Foundational Knowledge provides the basic understanding that is necessary for other kinds of learning.

 

2.     Application.

-       This familiar kind of learning occurs when students learn how to engage in some new kind of action, which may be intellectual, physical, social, etc.  Learning how to engage in various kinds of thinking (critical, creative, practical) is an important form of application learning.  But this category of significant learning also includes developing certain skills (e.g., communication, playing the piano) or learning how to manage complex projects.  Special Value:  Application learning allows other kinds of learning to become useful.

 

3.     Integration.

-       When students are able to see and understand the connections between different things, an important kind of learning has occurred.  Sometimes they make connections between specific ideas, between whole realms of ideas, between people, and/or between different realms of life (e.g., between school and work or between school and leisure life).  Special Value:  The act of making new connections gives learners a new form of power, especially intellectual power.

 

4.     Human Dimension.

-       When students learn something important about their own Self and/or about others, it enables them to interact more effectively with themselves or with others.  They discover the personal and/or social implications of what they have learned.  What they learn or the way in which they learn sometimes gives students a new understanding of themselves (self-image) or a new vision of what they want to become (self-ideal).  At other times, they acquire a better understanding of others: how and why others act the way they do, or how the learner can interact more effectively with others.  Special Value:  This kind of learning informs students about he human significance of what they are learning.  

 

5.     Caring.

-       Sometimes a learning experience changes the degree to which students care about something.  This may be reflected in the form of new feelings, interests, and/or values.  Any of these changes means students now care about something to a greater degree or in a way than they did before.  Special Value:  When students care about something, they then have the energy they need for learning more about it and making it a part of their lives.  Without the energy for learning, nothing significant happens.

 

6.     Learning How to learn.

-       This occurs when students learn something about the process of learning itself.  They may be learning how to be a better student, how to engage in a particular kind of inquiry (e.g., the scientific method), or how to become self-directing learners.  All of these constitute important forms of learning how to learn.  Special Value: This kind of learning enables students to continue learning in the future and to do so with greater effectiveness.

 

Formulating Course Goals Around Significant Learning (pp. 33-35)- By Fink

Developing Course-Specific learning Goals

What might the learning goals look like when formulated in terms of a specific course? To give a quick answer to this question, let me describe the learning goals for a course on world regional geography that I have taught, formulated around the SIX categories of significant learning.

“After this course is over, students will. . . .”

Foundational Knowledge

·      Have a mental map of the world and be able to correctly locate major places countries, mountain ranges, rivers, cities, oceans, and so on.

·      Understand major geographic concepts-physical geography, human geography, scale, demographic transition, and so on.

 

Application

·      Be able to find information on and analyze regional problems from a geographic perspective.

·      Be able to use an atlas effectively and efficiently.

 

 

Integration

·      Identify the interactions between geography and other realms of knowledge such as history, politics, economics, social structure, and so on.

 

Human Dimension

·      Be able to identify ways in which one’s personal life affects and is affected by interactions with other world regions.

·      Be able to intelligently discuss world events with other people and the impact of geography on these events.

 

Caring

·      Be interested in other places of the world and want to continue learning about those places via reading, TV, the Internet, and travel.

 

Learning How to Learn

·      Be able to interpret the geographic significance of ne”- information and ideas acquired in the future.

·      Be familiar with a number of popular geography journals and other sources of knowledge about other parts of the world.

·      Have some specific ideas about what else it would be desirable to know about other places in the world.

 

Significant Learning the literature on College Teaching (pp. 35-55)

In addition, the new taxonomy can organize and make sense of a broad range of published statements on what students can and should learn at the college level.

First Kind of Significant Learning: Foundational Knowledge.

The basic meaning of this kind of learning is understanding and remembering. …

 

‘The central theme in all this is that almost all kinds of significant learning will be based on, and hence will require students to have, an in-depth understanding of some subject matter. And this is why it has been labeled here as foundational knowledge. (p. 38) 

 

… Conceptual understanding: Developing a full understanding of the concepts associated with a subject to a degree that allows explanations, predictions, and so on.

Application:

-       Critical thinking: Analyzing and critiquing issues and situations

-       Practical thinking: Developing problem-solving and decision-making capabilities

-       Creativity: Creating new ideas, products, and perspectives

-       Managing complex projects: Being able to coordinate and sequence multiple tasks in a single project

-       Performance skills: Developing capabilities in such areas as foreign language, communication, operating technology, performing in the fine arts, sports

 

Integration:

-       Interdisciplinary learning: Connecting different disciplines and perspectives

-       Learning communities: Connecting different people

-       Learning and living/working: Connecting different realms of life

 

Human Dimension:

-       Leadership: Learning how to be an effective leader

-       Ethics, character building: Developing character and living by ethical principles

-       ‘Self-authorship: Learning how to create and take responsibility for one’s own life

-       Multicultural education: Becoming culturally sensitive in one’s interactions with others Working as a member of a team: Knowing how to contribute to a team

-       Citizenship: Being a responsible citizen of one’s local community, nation state, and other political entity

-       Serving others (local, national, world); Contributing to the well-being of others at multiple levels of society

-       Environmental ethics: Having ethical principles in relation to the nonhuman world

Caring:

-       Wanting to be a good student: Wanting to have a high GPA or be an honors student

-       Becoming excited about a particular activity or subject: For example, developing a keen interest in bird watching, reading history, or listening to music

-       Developing a commitment to live right: tor example, deciding to learn and follow Covey’s seven habits of highly effective people

 

Learning How to Learn:

·      How to be a better student: Learning how to engage in self-regulated learning or deep learning

·      How to inquire and construct knowledge: Learning how to engage in the scientific method, historical method, and other forms of inquiry

·      How to pursue self-directed or intentional learning: Developing a learning agenda and plan; becoming an intentional learner; becoming skilled in autodidaxy (the ability to direct one’s own learning and life); being a reflective practitioner

 

Syllabus (Fink p. 263)

1.     General management information, instructor, office hours, phone and so on

2.     Goals for the course

3.     Structure and sequence of class activities, including due dates for major assignments, tests, and projects

4.     Text and other required reading material

5.     Grading procedures

6.     Course policies: attendance, work turned in late, make-up exams, and so on